Most Active Stories
- Growing sagebrush and other native seed: Crackpot idea or lucrative business venture?
- Wyoming missed out on last uranium boom, but planning for the future
- South Africans strive to limit damage to landscape as elephant populations grow
- Wolf trapping raises concerns about trapping the wrong animals
- Study finds BLM’s wild horse management practices are flawed
On Air Staff and WPM Interns
Mon November 14, 2011
Tribes could regain authority to prosecute non-natives
On October 31 U.S. Senator and Indian Affairs Committee Chairman Daniel K. Akaka proposed legislation that would give tribal courts jurisdiction over non-Indians who committed crimes on tribal lands.
The authority to prosecute non-Natives in tribal courts was stripped in a 1978 Supreme Court ruling. Supporters of Senator Akaka’s bill say that the 1978 ruling led to an increase in violence on reservations and has resulted in unprosecuted and unpunished offenders.
The bill, called Stand Against Violence and Empower Native Women, hopes to specifically address the disproportionately high rates of domestic abuse, sexual assault and murder of native women.
Governor Matt Mead says logistics with jurisdiction are important to keep in mind.
"If the plan is to be able to bring non-Natives into Tribal Court, the first question is going to be, is the sixth Amendment guarantees going to be there? Are they going to be provided counsel? Are those attorneys or are they legal advisors?" Mead said. "I think the expectation would be that if you’re going to bring people into Native courts, non-Natives, that the protections of the constitution would be the same as they would be in any other court. "
Governor Mead also said that in Wyoming tribal leadership has not necessarily demanded a more robust court system because prosecutions do get done, even if not necessarily by tribal courts.